Products · Oral care · The Humble Co.

The Humble Co. Plant-Based Floss Picks, Mint

Reader ratings
The Humble Co. Plant-Based Floss Picks, Mint

Floss picks at about 4 cents each, with no detectable organic fluorine in a consumer lab screen. They are plastic: the thread is polyethylene and 47% of the handle is polypropylene, so “plant-based” describes about half the handle.

Best for People who need a handle, such as those with limited dexterity or parents flossing a child’s teeth, and want a pick without PTFE.

Our rating
Fair (3.0 of 5)
Price range
Budget
Size
150 picks (a 50-pick pack is about $4.49)

approx. $5.99 for 150 picks

See it on The Humble Co.’s site → (opens in a new tab)

We are not affiliated with The Humble Co.. This link goes to the maker’s own page, with no tracking code. How we're funded.

– out of 5

Loading ratings…

Have this product? Please rate it.

    Reviews are personal experiences, not research, and they never change our quality ratings. Every review is read by our team before it appears.

    How it scores Our rating, metric by metric Fair, 3.0 of 5
    1. Ingredients 40% of the rating 2 of 5

      Every material is named, with no PFAS, PTFE or BPA, but the thread is polyethylene and 47% of the handle is polypropylene, and the wax and flavor are not described.

    2. Active ingredient 20% of the rating 3 of 5

      We found no outside trial of these picks, and a 2019 Cochrane review found only low-certainty evidence that floss of any kind helps; a handle makes flossing easier for some people.

    3. Independent testing 15% of the rating 3 of 5

      A consumer lab screen found no detectable organic fluorine in one sample, but its methods note says it did not test picks while its list includes this one, so we count it as a partial result.

    4. Trust 10% of the rating 4 of 5

      The maker states the exact materials, including the 47% polypropylene, and we found no Prop 65 notice, recall or safety lawsuit; “shred resistant” and “developed by dentists” have no source.

    5. Value 15% of the rating 5 of 5

      About 4 cents a pick at the maker’s $5.99 for 150, the lowest cost per use of any floss here, though its own 50-pick pack costs about 9 cents a pick.

    The rating, 3.0 of 5, is the weighted average of these scores. See how we rank oral care and our standard.

    What it’s made of What touches your food, water, skin or air 3 materials
    1. Handle: 53% plant-based material (type not stated)
    2. Handle: 47% polypropylene
    3. Thread: polyethylene
    Who tested it What each test found, and who paid for it 2 tests
    • Independent Mamavation and Environmental Health News (the site earns affiliate income) September 2022

      The Humble Co. Plant-Based Materials Floss Picks had no detectable organic fluorine, a PFAS marker, in one sample at an EPA-certified lab. Oral-B Glide Pro-Health in the same screen measured 248,900 ppm. The article’s methods note says dental picks were not tested, yet it lists these picks, so we are unsure what was sampled. Open ↗ (opens in a new tab)

    • Maker’s own test The Humble Co. (statement on its product page)

      Says the picks contain no PFAS, PTFE or BPA. No test report is published. Open ↗ (opens in a new tab)

    Who paid, and why it matters
    • Independent The tester took no money from the maker for it: a consumer group, a journalist, a university or a regulator.
    • Paid certification An outside lab or certifier tested or listed it, and the maker paid for that.
    • Maker’s own test A lab report or certificate of analysis the maker commissioned and published.

    A certification is a floor, not a verdict: it checks what its program checks and nothing else. We weigh tests by someone with no stake in the result most.

    What people ask Worries raised online and elsewhere, and what we found 5 questions
    Are these picks really “plant-based”?
    Only partly. The product page (opens in a new tab) says 53% of the handle is plant-based material, 47% is polypropylene and the thread is polyethylene, so most of what touches your mouth is plastic. The maker’s claim is that it removed more than half of the petroleum plastic of a conventional pick.
    Do floss picks shed microplastics?
    We found no study of these picks. They are single-use plastic, and our guide to reducing microplastics covers the wider question. A silk floss such as Dental Lace avoids it.
    Is it really PFAS-free?
    The maker says so, and Mamavation’s screen (opens in a new tab) found none in one sample. That screen measured total organic fluorine, not named PFAS, and says it did not test picks, so treat the result as a good sign and not a guarantee.
    Are the picks as good as string floss?
    We found no trial comparing them. The 2019 Cochrane review (opens in a new tab) of 35 trials found floss or interdental brushes with brushing may reduce gingivitis or plaque, with low to very low certainty, and that interdental brushes may do better than floss.
    Are the influencers who recommend it paid?
    We found no affiliate or ambassador page linked from the maker’s product page, and could not read Reddit or social media, so we cannot say.
    Why we chose it What put it on our list 3 points
    • In a lab screen of 39 floss products by Mamavation and Environmental Health News (first published in 2022, updated in 2024), The Humble Co. Plant-Based Materials Floss Picks had no detectable organic fluorine, a marker for PFAS.
    • The maker states the materials, including the plastic: handle 53% plant-based material and 47% polypropylene, thread polyethylene. It says no PFAS, PTFE or BPA.
    • It is inexpensive: $5.99 for 150 picks on the maker’s US store is about 4 cents a pick.
    Trade-offs What to weigh before you buy 3 points
    • These are plastic picks. The thread is polyethylene and nearly half the handle is petroleum-based polypropylene, so they fall outside the category’s preferred silk, plant-fiber floss.
    • The lab result is one sample in a screen for total organic fluorine, run for an advocacy outlet that earns affiliate income. Its methods note says picks were not tested, so the result is a partial one.
    • The product copy says “shred resistant” without explaining how. In this category that phrase can mean a fluoropolymer coating, but the lab found no fluorine here.
    What to know Details worth knowing first

    Floss picks are convenient, but most have a plastic handle, and the thread in some is coated with PTFE, a PFAS. A 2019 study linked flossing with PTFE-type floss to higher blood levels of some PFAS; our guide to avoiding PFAS has the background. Humble’s picks do not use PTFE according to the maker, and a consumer lab screen found no organic fluorine in them.

    The plain description is a plastic pick without PTFE. The handle is 53% plant-based material and 47% polypropylene, and the thread is polyethylene. For ways to cut plastic exposure more broadly, see reducing microplastics. If you can floss by hand, silk avoids the plastic: see Dental Lace.

    Keep the limits of the lab result in mind. It is one sample, tested for total organic fluorine rather than for named PFAS, and the article’s own methods note says picks were not tested. We priced the picks at the maker’s own US store.

    What we checked Each claim, and how sure we are of it 4 checks
    How The Humble Co. Plant-Based Floss Picks, Mint measures up against our oral care criteria
    What we checked What we found
    PFAS-free floss Verified No detectable organic fluorine in one sample in Mamavation’s screen (first published in 2022, updated in 2024). The maker says no PFAS, PTFE or BPA. The screen did not name the individual PFAS it could detect, and its methods note says picks were not tested.
    Every ingredient listed Maker’s claim Materials are named: handle 53% plant-based material and 47% polypropylene, thread polyethylene. Any wax or flavor is not described.
    Honest claims Maker’s claim “Plant-based” covers 53% of the handle, not the thread. “Shred resistant” and “developed by dentists” are the maker’s words.
    Recalls, Prop 65 notices and lawsuits Verified None about safety found for The Humble Co. on 2026-10-23. A 2023 federal suit against Humble Brands, Inc. was filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act, not over product safety.
    What the labels mean
    • Verified We opened an independent record that confirms it: a certifier’s listing, a regulator’s list or a lab report. It is linked under Sources.
    • Maker’s claim The maker says so on its own page or label. We read it but found no independent record.
    • Not verified We looked and could not confirm it, or the maker does not say. Treat it as unknown.
    Sources Where our facts come from 5 sources
    1. The Humble Co. Plant-based Floss Picks, Mint (150 pcs): product page. Maker’s page. Materials, claims and price, seen 2026-10-23. The maker’s US store also sells a 50-pick pack at $4.49. Amazon and Target sell 200-pick packs (four packs of 50) at $15.99, about 8 cents a pick, so we list no other store for the 150-pick pack. Open ↗ (opens in a new tab)
    2. Mamavation and Environmental Health News: 39 dental floss products screened for organic fluorine (first published September 2022; products added August 2024). Test report. An EPA-certified lab, one sample per product, total organic fluorine only. Mamavation is an advocacy outlet with affiliate links. The tested name was “The Humble Co. Plant-Based Materials Floss Picks.” Its methods note says picks were not tested. Open ↗ (opens in a new tab)
    3. California Attorney General: Proposition 65 60-day notice search (Humble). Certifier or regulator listing. Only notices against unrelated companies (Humble Tea, Humble Beauty); none naming The Humble Co. as of 2026-10-23. Open ↗ (opens in a new tab)
    4. Worthington et al. 2019: home use of interdental cleaning devices in addition to toothbrushing (Cochrane review). Independent source. 35 trials, 3,929 adults. Low to very low certainty; interdental brushes may do better than floss. Open ↗ (opens in a new tab)
    5. Boronow et al. 2019: serum PFAS and exposure-related behaviors, including flossing with Oral-B Glide. Independent source. Why PTFE floss matters: 178 women, with higher levels of some PFAS among Glide users. Open ↗ (opens in a new tab)
    Alternatives Other options to compare 2 options
    • Dental Lace silk floss No plastic in the floss or jar, but you hold it by hand, and silk can shred on tight teeth.
    • Radius Vegan Sponge Floss Woven nylon floss with plant waxes, about $5 a spool, with a clean result in Mamavation’s lab screen. No handle.

    Weekly research digest

    New topics and updated research, once a week when there's something new. How it works